Search for: "Lucent Technologies Corp"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2009, 11:07 pm
Bloomberg reported: An Alcatel-Lucent SA patent that resulted in a $358 million jury verdict against Microsoft Corp. was rejected [in a re-exam Office Action] by the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
Microsoft Corp. lost a patent infringement lawsuit over violating two patents related to digital music, a federal jury determined on Feb. 22.From Toronto Daily News:Microsoft now must pay $1.5 billion in damages to telecommunications equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent SA who said the patents in question govern the conversion of audio into the digital MP3 file format on personal computers. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A federal judge has signed off on a $1.53 billion jury verdict in favor of Alcatel-Lucent SA in a digital music patent dispute against Microsoft Corp., which plans to appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
Microsoft Corp. said a U.S. jury awarded Alcatel-Lucent $367.4 million in damages after finding that the company had violated two patents related to the user interface in its software. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm
The case, Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:48 pm
A federal jury in San Diego has just ruled that Microsoft Corp. must pay $1.52 billion for infringing on two Alcatel-Lucent patents involving the MP3 audio code technology. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:27 pm
AG Communications Systems Corp. and Lucent Technologies, a single employer (33-CA-14450; 350 NLRB No. 15) Chicago, IL June 29, 2007. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 3:53 am
District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego ruled on the post-trial motions in the patent infringement case involving Alcatel-Lucent and Microsoft Corp. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:28 am
[JURIST] A federal judge in California on Thursday dismissed all claims in the second of four patent infringement lawsuits filed by Alcatel-Lucent [corporate website] against Microsoft Corp. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:10 pm
For example, Microsoft recently dodged a $357 million jury award bullet in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:28 pm
In a case brought by Alcatel-Lucent regarding two of its MP3 digital music file standard patents, the jury determined that Microsoft infringed the plaintiff's patents, rejecting Microsoft's argument that it had previously paid $16 million for a license for the technology from Fraunhofer Gesellschaft and that it had a right to continue to use the licensed technology in its products. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
AP reports: A jury in San Diego on April 4 ordered Microsoft Corp. to pay $367.4 million to Alcatel-Lucent for infringing on two patents, a decision the software maker vowed to appeal.There are many related actions. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:45 am
PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Panduit Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:27 am
While Lucent argues that "the record was replete with evidence that the HQ encoder will be invoked as a result of common conditions that occur routinely in practice," as the Federal Circuit noted in E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3Com Corp., 473 F.3d 1213, 1223 (Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:49 pm
LSI Corp., No. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:24 pm
***Bloomberg made the link between the IT industry and the proposed legislation clearer:Members of the House and Senate, supported by technology companies including Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp., introduced legislation that would make the biggest changes to US patent law in 50 years. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:04 pm
” Two recent Federal Circuit cases discussing the evidentiary bases required for the Georgia Pacific factors, Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 4:04 am
Unlike prior years, it appears that Corp Fin is permitting the inclusion of some of these proposals - in past years, they were universally viewed as "ordinary business" and exclusion was permitted. [read post]
